Namely, the EU’s assessment is that the conditions for opening the bridge have been met. The bridge connects the northern part of North Mitrovica, where the Serbian population lives, with the southern part, which is predominantly inhabited by Albanians.
In a strongly worded letter of protest, seen by Tanjug, Petković said that this assessment was particularly concerning for Serbia, as it neither reflects the actual situation on the ground nor takes into account the fact that key prerequisites previously agreed upon within the framework of the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue have yet to be fulfilled.
As an example, he pointed out that the issue of the demarcation between “North and South” Mitrovica in the Suvi Do cadastral zone has not been resolved, even though its resolution is directly linked to agreements reached within the Dialogue concerning the main bridge over the Ibar.
He also noted that under the 25 August 2015 Bridge Agreement, issues concerning freedom of movement, infrastructure works and the opening of the bridge were addressed together with security matters of direct importance to the Serbian population in the area around the bridge, Suvi Do and other sensitive areas.
Komentari 0
Pogledaj komentare Pošalji komentar